When Desire Became a Product

There was a time when sex was quiet. Not silent, but sacred. It lived in privacy, in connection, in moments that belonged only to two people. It was not everywhere. It was not loud. It was not constantly asking for attention. Today, sex is no longer something we experience; it is something we consume. And somewhere along the way, women became the primary face of that consumption.

Scroll through the internet, advertisements, social media, dating apps, or porn platforms, and a pattern becomes impossible to ignore. Women’s bodies are everywhere. Not as humans first, but as visuals. As bait. As currency. As marketing tools. This is often dismissed as freedom, choice, or empowerment. But the uncomfortable truth is that what we are witnessing looks far more like exploitation disguised as liberation.

At its core, this is not a story about women. It is a story about desire and how modern systems learned to monetize it.

Human sexuality was never meant to be just a procreation tool, but it was never meant to be a business either. For most of human history, sex existed within boundaries. Cultural, emotional, relational. It was tied to bonding, trust, intimacy, and continuity of life. Desire had context. It had limits. It had meaning.

Technology shattered those limits.

When high speed internet met anonymity, infinite novelty, and algorithms designed to keep us hooked, sex was stripped of its depth and reduced to stimulation. What once connected people now isolates them. What once bonded now fragments. The body became content. Desire became data. Attention became profit.

Women are used more visibly in this world not because they are weaker or more sexual by nature, but because male desire is more easily triggered visually. The system learned this. And capitalism does not ask whether something is healthy or meaningful. It only asks whether it works.

So women’s bodies became the fastest way to capture attention.

Men are not winning in this system either. They are being farmed for dopamine, trapped in cycles of craving without fulfillment. Their loneliness is profitable. Their unmet intimacy keeps the machine running. Women, on the other hand, are taught that attention equals worth, that visibility equals power, and that desirability is the fastest route to validation in a world that rarely values depth.

Different hooks. Same cage.

Sex did not become more free. It became more mechanical. Louder. More exaggerated. More extreme. What once required intimacy now requires nothing at all. No presence. No vulnerability. No human connection. Just a screen and a click.

And yet, despite living in the most sexually saturated era in history, people are more lonely than ever. More anxious. More disconnected. More confused about love, commitment, and meaning. This is the paradox no one wants to confront.

Nothing in nature is unnecessary. Desire is not wrong. Attraction is not sinful. Sexuality is not the problem. The problem begins when something deeply human is removed from its natural context and turned into an endless commodity.

Sex without soul feels empty. Sex without meaning feels hollow. Sex without connection feels loud but lonely.

What we are witnessing today is not sexual liberation. It is the commodification of intimacy. A system that feeds on attention, exploits insecurity, and leaves both men and women less whole than before.

Maybe sex was never meant to be everywhere. Maybe it was meant to be rare, intentional, grounding. Something that connects rather than consumes. Something that gives rather than takes.

And maybe the discomfort we feel when we see how sexualized the world has become is not repression or judgment, but intuition. A quiet reminder that something essential has been lost.

If nothing in nature is unnecessary, then reducing one of our most powerful instincts to a product was never progress.

It was a mistake.



Leave a comment